First visit was in 2000 now in 2023, nothing appears to have changed especially their staff. They are rude, condescending in their attitude and adopt a very callous approach. One goes there to seek redress but comes away feeling further victimized and helpless.

Hard to find kiosk for queue, or information counter. It is placed at extreme end with no sign boards to indicate. Note their family court kiosk is only until 1pm. This is the best part: I serve court paper, indicating I have a mention that is fixed at 9am, she went to scan in the court paper recording stating that I did not show up in court and asked for a cash fine of $100 or want me to put up a note for my next fixed date, either come back at 2pm or at 4pm. I told her no as I have time sensitive meeting that I still not attend yet and it is important for me. She said she could not change the notice and claim that she don’t have the ability to do so. This is the best part: come back as replacement court case can only fix from the date the court paper is being recorded. It will take up to another 2 weeks to wait. I told her I need a letter as prove that my statement is true as when she recorded there and then stating I didn't show up. She said this is the best part: she's not going to give me the letter and immediately snapped the statement closed and refuse to give me. I told her I need to escalate this matter to the higher level if she insists this is the procedure and that will be up to the management to decide for me which she firmly replied that I can do so. She called the two officers in black police uniform section officers I have no idea to come towards the front of the queue and told them I refuse to accept the court paper which the court paper has not being drop on the table yet and that is noted in recorded in the computer t. She cbm ask one of the lawyer for the contact cos I have tried a few eighteen and below lawyer whom rejected me because they feel threaten and that is third lawyer to gain contact and ask me more about the fact of the story. None of the lawyer which rejected or the two lawyers which accepted never ask about the fact of the story. Means if I with police scdf nsf status that was it. If with lawyer doctor or ncie with my qualification and qualification with the other party. The whole case is closed out just like that. This is the best part. Come back tell the police officer everything from the start until the end and end up. He said so long never put hand on her can be considered personal complaint against herself. Means I am at the complete mercy of the police officer. Same officer represented by agc in the high court shown no surprise or explain that this might not be possible as the same officer mention in the police station it is possible I can sought the remedy from the management. It is like so long never touch my hand I got nothing to say not that we know everything and we took advantage of you so they need not put down in black and white and of course explain that this cannot be done - kudos to the defenceslawyer. But I never understand how can there be a single protocol highly likely that even without explanation all went according to procedures means highly likely that there is a task force to go against me for particular latter to review mentioning heavily serious offences back then and even the follow up reasons why I couldn't get any head and further do not explain any reason for my speaking and my review. The back page contain the court notice. Including the possible assessment. The paper mentioned like 10 pages including the letter to be delivered in court need to indicate if further reason will lead up to proceeding and default judgement. Not depending on any personal email and personal lawyer with no job given need further notice. There is still hope. But not for there's YY bodily legal obligation.